Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: WYLEED M., and Others Dependant Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Said M., Respondent-Appellant, Jewish Child Care Association of New York, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about October 24, 2007, which denied respondent father's motion to vacate, inter alia, an order of disposition, same court and Judge, entered on or about April 23, 2007, which, upon respondent's default, inter alia, transferred the custody and guardianship of the subject children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Judge, entered on or about November 14, 2007, which denied respondent's motion to restore the action to the calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent's initial motion to set aside the default was properly denied since respondent failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear at the dispositional hearing (see e.g. Matter of Jones, 128 A.D.2d 403, 404, 512 N.Y.S.2d 689 [1987] ). The record belies respondent's claim that he never received notice of the proceeding. Respondent's subsequent motion to restore the matter to the calendar was also properly denied as respondent's proffered excuse for his nonattendance at the hearing on the initial motion, that he went to the wrong floor of the courthouse on the day the motion was heard, was also not reasonable, particularly in light of respondent's history of failing to appear at previously scheduled proceedings.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 05, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)