Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Francis GREENBURGER, Petitioner-Respondent, v. The TAX COMMISSION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered June 1, 2007, which denied respondents' motion to dismiss the consolidated proceedings for lack of standing, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
While there is no question that petitioner's pecuniary interest was affected by the tax assessment against the subject property, petitioner, a fractional lessee, failed to establish that it has standing to maintain these tax certiorari proceedings by demonstrating either that the lease “expressly confers the right to assert the lessor's undivided property interest in a challenge of the assessment” or that it “is required to pay directly the taxes levied against the lessor's undivided parcel” (Matter of Waldbaum, Inc. v. Finance Adm'r of City of N.Y., 74 N.Y.2d 128, 132, 544 N.Y.S.2d 561, 542 N.E.2d 1078 [1989] ).
Article 6.01(d) of the parties' lease provides that petitioner “shall have the right to direct Landlord to contest or review any and all Taxes ․ by legal proceedings or in such manner as Landlord in its opinion shall deem advisable,” at petitioner's expense. This provision does not grant petitioner the right to commence a certiorari action in its own name (compare Matter of Ames Dept. Store, No. 418 v. Assessor of Town of Greece, 261 A.D.2d 835, 689 N.Y.S.2d 791 [1999], and Matter of K-Mart Corp. v. Board of Assessors of County of Tompkins, 176 A.D.2d 1034, 575 N.Y.S.2d 185 [1991] ). Nor do letters from the landlord consenting to the litigation, written years after commencement of the proceedings, retroactively confer standing (see e.g. Matter of Midway Shopping Center v. Town of Greenburgh, 11 Misc.3d 1071(A), 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50501(U), *10, 2006 WL 820261 [2006] ).
While petitioner pays the overwhelming proportion of the taxes and the landlord is a tax-exempt entity, petitioner is not required to pay the taxes directly to the taxing authority; he pays the taxes to the landlord (see Waldbaum, 74 N.Y.2d at 132, 544 N.Y.S.2d 561, 542 N.E.2d 1078).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 02, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)