Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ROBERT K., and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Tanya L.J., Respondent-Appellant, Jewish Child Care Association of New York, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. Hoffman, J.), entered on or about January 4, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a finding of mental illness, terminated respondent's parental rights to the subject children and committed their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence, including expert testimony from a court-appointed psychologist, who examined respondent for several hours and reviewed all of her available medical records, supported the determination that respondent is presently and for the foreseeable future unable, by reason of mental illness, to provide proper and adequate care for her children (see Social Services Law § 384-b[4][c]; 6[a] ). The psychologist testified that respondent suffered from, inter alia, a longstanding depressive disorder with chronic psychotic features. She lacked insight into her condition, was noncompliant with her medication and the prognosis for improvement in her condition was characterized as poor (see Matter of Shanta C., 47 A.D.3d 422, 423, 849 N.Y.S.2d 235 [2008]; Matter of Mitchell Randell K., 41 A.D.3d 119, 837 N.Y.S.2d 115 [2007] ).
Although the psychologist examined respondent almost two years prior to the fact-finding hearing, his detailed testimony supported his conclusions that due to respondent's mental illness, she was unable to parent in the present and for the foreseeable future (see Matter of Joyce T., 65 N.Y.2d 39, 45-46, 489 N.Y.S.2d 705, 478 N.E.2d 1306 [1985] ). Furthermore, respondent's testimony that at the time of the hearing, she had recently participated in psychiatric counseling and started complying with drug therapy does not warrant a different conclusion.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)