Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Oscar CELY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. O'BRIEN & KREITZBERG, et al., Defendants, Regional Scaffolding and Hoisting Co., Inc., Defendant-Respondent. [And A Third-Party Action].
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered July 11, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, ordered and adjudged that the settlement of plaintiff's claim against defendant Regional Scaffolding and Hoisting Co., Inc. in the amount of $300,000 was without interest, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered January 5, 2006, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the July 11, 2006 order and judgment.
Plaintiff's request for interest pursuant to CPLR 5003-a(e) was properly denied on the ground that he failed to timely provide Regional with the Hold Harmless Stipulation and W-9 Form. Although neither the open court settlement agreement nor CPLR 5003-a requires the submission of those documents as a condition of payment of the settlement amount, defendant's request for them is supported by statute and case law (see Internal Revenue Code [26 USC] § 3406 [a] [1][A] [corporation required to deduct and withhold tax if payee failed to furnish name, address and taxpayer identification number, information requested on W-9 Form]; In re Emergency Beacon Corp., 52 B.R. 828, 830 n. 3 [S.D.N.Y.1985]; see also Liss v. Brigham Park Coop. Apts. Sec. No. 3, Inc., 264 A.D.2d 717, 694 N.Y.S.2d 742 [1999] [general release and stipulation of settlement defective in not providing for release of plaintiff's Medicare lien] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 15, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)