Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ARABESQUE RECORDINGS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAPACITY LLC, Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered May 31, 2007, which granted defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
A corporation's failure to file a change of address with the Secretary of State does not constitute a per se barrier to vacatur of a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 317, which permits a defendant who has been “served with a summons other than by personal delivery” and “who does not appear” to defend the action “upon a finding of the court that he did not personally receive notice of the summons in time to defend and has a meritorious defense” (see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 141-142, 501 N.Y.S.2d 8, 492 N.E.2d 116 [1986] ). The affidavit submitted by defendant established that it did not receive personal notice of the summons in time to defend and that its defense was meritorious. We reject plaintiff's analogy to cases developed under the Vehicle and Traffic Law (see Cruz v. Narisi, 32 A.D.3d 981, 983, 821 N.Y.S.2d 643 [2006] [Goldstein, J., concurring] [“since motor vehicles are mobile, timely notification of the change of ownership of a registered owner of a motor vehicle is vital”] ).
Even if, as plaintiff contends, defendant's motion should have been considered a motion to renew, it was properly granted (see B.B.Y. Diamonds Corp. v. Five Star Designs, 6 A.D.3d 263, 264, 775 N.Y.S.2d 34 [2004] ). Defendant's initial failure to submit an affidavit in admissible form was demonstrably inadvertent and defendant failed to show any prejudice attributable to the delay caused by the failure.
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 15, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)