Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Daggana SILLAH, et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v. Shahid TANVIR, Respondent-Appellant.
Orders, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered June 10, 2002, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, granted petitioners' motion for a preliminary injunction, inter alia, enjoining respondent from interfering with petitioners' operation of Islamic Falah of America, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
This special proceeding seeks a declaration that petitioners are the duly elected trustees of their mosque, Islamic Falah of America. The petition, alleging that respondent continues to interfere with the operation of the mosque, is timely, having been filed on June 10, 2001, within four months of petitioners' election at a special meeting of the not-for-profit corporation on April 1, 2001 (CPLR 217[1] ). Respondent has failed to demonstrate that this proceeding was commenced on improper notice. Not-For-Profit Corporation Law § 618, upon which he relies, is inapplicable to this proceeding, which was brought by persons who were successful in gaining office as trustees and who are therefore not “aggrieved by an election” so as to implicate the pertinent statutory notice requirements. We agree with the IAS court that the meeting was properly conducted and properly convened (Not-For-Profit Corporation Law § 601[c][4]; § 603). Petitioners' supporters, who called for and voted at the meeting, were members of the corporation within the contemplation of Religious Corporation Law § 195 (Religious Corporation Law § 2-b[1][a] ). Respondent does not specifically challenge the capacity of any member or group of members to vote. Thus, petitioners established a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims, and the IAS court properly granted the preliminary injunction (CPLR 6301).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 28, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)