Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JAMAICA PUBLIC SERVICE CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LA INTERAMERICANA COMPANIA DE SEGUROS GENERALES S.A., et al., Defendants-Respondents, AIU Insurance Co., et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered November 14, 2002, which granted defendants La Interamericana Compania de Seguros Generales S.A. and Seneca Insurance Company's motions for renewal of their prior motions for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered March 5, 2003, which denied plaintiff's motion to reargue, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.
Plaintiff's own evidence conclusively establishes that the efficient and dominant cause of the destruction of its boiler was the explosion of unconsumed fuel (see Album Realty v. American Home Assur. Co., 80 N.Y.2d 1008, 1010-1011, 592 N.Y.S.2d 657, 607 N.E.2d 804; Home Ins. Co. v. American Ins. Co., 147 A.D.2d 353, 354, 537 N.Y.S.2d 516), an event that is beyond the scope of the coverage afforded by the subject machinery breakdown policy. In its responses to interrogatories, plaintiff stated that water escaped from a burst steam pipe, flashed into steam and temporarily extinguished the burner flames within the boiler, causing fuel to accumulate and to explode when it came in contact with a heat source. Plaintiff's expert offered no evidence to overcome the deposition testimony of two of defendants' experts as to the cause of the explosion, and his opinion is therefore tantamount to speculation.
We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 06, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)