Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael JOYCE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered November 7, 2007, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Late at night, police officers received a radio transmission about a gunpoint robbery which contained the location of the crime and a description of the robber. Shortly after the robbery the officers saw defendant, who approximately matched the description, near the site of the robbery. The circumstances provided, at least, an objective credible reason (see People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223, 386 N.Y.S.2d 375, 352 N.E.2d 562 [1976] ) to ask defendant for information. Since the lighting was dim, the officers asked defendant to come closer. As defendant approached, the officers observed that he was walking at an angle, that his left bicep was stiff by his side while his left forearm was held at his waist, and that he was shifting his body weight to his left side. An officer testified that, based on his experience, this pattern of conduct signified an attempt to conceal a handgun. We conclude that defendant's behavior, coupled with the circumstances suggesting his possible involvement in the robbery, provided reasonable suspicion to justify a frisk (see People v. Soto, 266 A.D.2d 74, 698 N.Y.S.2d 629 [1999], lv. denied 94 N.Y.2d 925, 708 N.Y.S.2d 365, 729 N.E.2d 1164 [2000]; compare People v. Powell, 246 A.D.2d 366, 667 N.Y.S.2d 725 [1998], appeal dismissed 92 N.Y.2d 886, 678 N.Y.S.2d 584, 700 N.E.2d 1220 [1998] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 13, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)