Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Patrick WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), rendered March 25, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 1/212 to 4 1/212 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict convicting defendant of possession with intent to sell was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, notwithstanding defendant's acquittal of criminal sale of a controlled substance (see People v. Rayam, 94 N.Y.2d 557, 708 N.Y.S.2d 37, 729 N.E.2d 694 [2000]; People v. Freeman, 298 A.D.2d 311, 749 N.Y.S.2d 231 [2002], lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 582, 755 N.Y.S.2d 717, 785 N.E.2d 739 [2003] ). Defendant was the only person who matched the description transmitted by the undercover officer to the field team and was arrested at the location of the alleged sale in possession of the same type of cocaine as that allegedly purchased by the officer.
The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the prosecution to elicit testimony that the choice of location for the undercover operation was influenced by community complaints (see e.g. People v. Johnson, 309 A.D.2d 565, 765 N.Y.S.2d 346 [2003], lv. denied 1 N.Y.3d 574, 775 N.Y.S.2d 791, 807 N.E.2d 904 [2003] ). This background testimony was relevant to explain the police presence and to dispel any unfair jury speculation as to why the neighborhood in question was targeted. The court's careful limiting instructions prevented any prejudice to defendant (id.).
Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 09, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)