Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jaysen VENTURA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis J. Boyle, J. at first jury trial and mistrial declaration; David Stadtmauer, J. at second jury trial and sentence), rendered November 14, 2002, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the first degree and assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 22 years and 8 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's retrial following a mistrial was not barred by the principle of double jeopardy. The record fails to support defendant's claim that the prosecutor deliberately provoked the court's declaration of a mistrial (see Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 102 S.Ct. 2083, 72 L.Ed.2d 416 [1982]; Matter of Davis v. Brown, 87 N.Y.2d 626, 641 N.Y.S.2d 819, 664 N.E.2d 884 [1996] ). The court declared a mistrial, without objection, because the jury, which had deliberated for many days and issued numerous deadlock notes, was unable to reach a unanimous verdict. There is nothing but speculation to support defendant's assertion that the deadlock resulted from the People's investigation, and the court's inquiry, into possible juror misconduct involving voir dire responses. In any event, the record establishes that there was a good-faith basis for the People's actions.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given to inconsistencies in testimony, were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations (see People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94, 68 N.E. 112 [1903] ). The evidence establishes that defendant's confessions were voluntary and reliable.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 14, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)