Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of C. Thomas GILBERT and Karen Gilbert, Petitioners, v. Ralph ENDRES, Jeanne Gage, Bruce Hawkins, James Schwartzer, Nadina Stevens, Betty Windstein and Johanna Zonnevylle, Constituting the Planning Board of Town of South Bristol, Respondents.
Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, transferred to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804(g), seeking to annul the determination granting their neighbor a special use permit to hold an annual fall harvest festival on her property. Respondents failed to file with the clerk of the court or to include in the record before us “a certified transcript of the record of the proceedings under consideration” as required by CPLR 7804(e). We note that also absent from the record are any findings of fact underlying the determination to issue a special use permit. We therefore vacate the transfer order and remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with our decision herein, inasmuch as “the papers are insufficient” (7804[g]; cf. Matter of Butler v. Town of Throop, 303 A.D.2d 976, 756 N.Y.S.2d 678). Upon remittal, respondents must provide the requisite certified transcript, and the court must dispose of any “objections as could terminate the proceeding” (7804[g] ) and thus could obviate any need to transfer the proceeding to this Court based on the existence of a substantial evidence issue in the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously vacated without costs and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Ontario County, for further proceedings.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 30, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)