Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: SHANELL K.M., etc., A Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Elizabeth V., etc., Respondent-Appellant, Family Support Systems Unlimited, Inc., Petitioner-Respondent, Eduardo M., Respondent.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about October 15, 2007, which terminated respondent-appellant's parental rights to her daughter on the ground of permanent neglect, and committed custody of the child to petitioner and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court's finding on permanent neglect was correct within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b. Petitioner scheduled regular visitation, made appropriate referrals to programs designed to address appellant's substance abuse problems and to improve her parenting skills, and repeatedly reminded her of the necessity of complying with the terms of her service plan and the consequences of failing to do so. This demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, petitioner's diligent efforts, tailored to appellant's individual situation, to remedy the obstacles barring family reunification and thereby strengthen the relationship between appellant and her daughter (see § 384-b[7][a], [f]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 373, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139 [1984]; Matter of Star A., 55 N.Y.2d 560, 564, 450 N.Y.S.2d 465, 435 N.E.2d 1080 [1982] ).
The preponderance of the evidence also established that despite such diligent efforts, appellant failed, during the relevant statutory period, to sufficiently maintain contact with and plan for the return of the child (see § 384-b[7][a] ). Appellant never completed parenting skills classes or a drug treatment program on an inpatient or outpatient basis, nor did she undergo counseling, and she actually visited with the child while under the influence of drugs. This constituted failure to comply with the terms of the service plan petitioner had prepared for her (see Matter of Sean LaMonte Vonta M., 54 A.D.3d 635, 864 N.Y.S.2d 21 [2008]; Matter of Angel P., 44 A.D.3d 448, 843 N.Y.S.2d 288 [2007] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 10, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)