Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: OLUSHOLA W.A., a Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Moruff Afolabi A., Respondent-Appellant, Family Support Systems Unlimited, Inc., Petitioner-Respondent.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about March 7, 2006, which, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, terminated respondent father's parental rights to the subject child and committed her custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence supported the determination that the father permanently neglected the subject child by missing more than two-thirds of the scheduled visits and failing to plan for her future, despite the agency's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see Social Services Law § 384-b[7][a]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 384-386, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139 [1984] ). The record clearly demonstrates that although the father was repeatedly made aware of the need for him to complete classes in parenting skills, counseling and anger management, he refused to avail himself of these services before this petition was filed.
The court properly found that the child's best interests were served by terminating respondent's parental rights, thus freeing her for adoption by her foster mother, the child's maternal aunt, with whom she had lived for 5 of her 12 years (see Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d at 147-148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824). Despite the father's claim that he had benefitted from the program he attended, there was no evidence that he had a realistic and feasible plan to provide an adequate and stable home for the child (see Matter of Latasha W., 268 A.D.2d 340, 701 N.Y.S.2d 418 [2000] ).
We have considered respondent's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 12, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)