Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Melvin SOLOMON, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 220.09[1] ). We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in refusing to suppress the tangible property seized from his person as the fruits of an illegal arrest. The evidence at the suppression hearing established that the police responded to a 911 call indicating that defendant refused to leave the home of the caller. The caller stated that defendant initially had been a guest in her home but, after they had a disagreement, she wanted defendant to leave and he refused to do so. The police observed defendant leaving the caller's home when they arrived there, and a police chase ensued. The police eventually apprehended defendant and returned with him to the caller's home, whereupon the caller identified defendant and asked that he be arrested. The police then charged defendant with harassment in the second degree (§ 240.26), which is a violation rather than a felony or misdemeanor. The police may arrest a person for a violation without a warrant when, inter alia, they have “reasonable cause to believe that such person has committed such offense in [their] presence” (CPL 140.10[1][a]; see People v. Van Buren, 4 N.Y.3d 640, 646-647, 797 N.Y.S.2d 802, 830 N.E.2d 1130). The warrantless arrest of defendant for a violation, i.e., harassment, that did not occur in the presence of the arresting officers was therefore illegal, requiring suppression of “all evidence obtained as the result of [the] arrest” (People v. Williams, 191 A.D.2d 989, 989, 595 N.Y.S.2d 588, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 729, 602 N.Y.S.2d 826, 622 N.E.2d 327).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law, that part of the motion seeking to suppress physical evidence is granted, the indictment is dismissed and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for proceedings pursuant to CPL 470.45.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 07, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)