Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald CHILDS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J. on speedy trial motions; John A.K. Bradley, J. at hearing, jury trial and sentence), rendered October 4, 2004, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal sale of marijuana in the fourth degree, and unlawful possession of marijuana, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years concurrent with a term of 60 days and a conditional discharge, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's speedy trial motions. The periods from July 9 to 30, 2003 and October 22 to November 12, 2003 are clearly excludable (see CPL 30.30[4][f]; People v. Lassiter, 240 A.D.2d 293, 294, 658 N.Y.S.2d 317 [1997] ). Given the excludability of these periods, the total amount of includable time falls below the 182-day limit. Accordingly, we find it unnecessary to reach any other issues relating to the speedy trial motions.
Even though the People did not prove the weight of the marijuana, defendant's conviction for criminal sale of marijuana in the fourth degree was proper because there was evidence that he sold the marijuana for consideration (see Penal Law § 221.35, § 221.40).
The court provided a suitable remedy when a witness made a brief reference to evidence that had been suppressed after a hearing (see People v. Santiago, 52 N.Y.2d 865, 437 N.Y.S.2d 75, 418 N.E.2d 668 [1981] ). Defendant's remaining pro se contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
We perceive no basis to disturb the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 03, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)