IN RE: Police Officer Alan ORTEGA (2005)

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated March 7, 2003, dismissing petitioner from his position as a New York City Police Officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Saralee Evans, J.], entered December 24, 2003) dismissed, without costs.

 Substantial evidence, including documentary submissions and the testimony of a civilian complainant, supervisory police officers, and individuals previously engaged in business with petitioner, supported the hearing officer's findings that petitioner, inter alia, violated orders prohibiting his off-duty employment beyond a specified date, made misrepresentations respecting such employment to a superior officer, failed to report his sale of firearms to a licensed firearm dealer, and harassed and wrongfully subjected a civilian to physical contact and thereafter disobeyed an order directing him to stay away from her.   The underlying credibility determinations of the hearing officer are essentially unreviewable (see Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443-444, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193 [1987];  Matter of Seligson v. Kerik, 295 A.D.2d 262, 744 N.Y.S.2d 665 [2002] ).

 The hearing officer was not obliged to recuse himself on the ground of bias.   The circumstance that the hearing officer had presided over a prior proceeding involving petitioner did not suffice to demonstrate that he was biased against petitioner (see People v. Curkendall, 12 A.D.3d 710, 783 N.Y.S.2d 707 [2004] ).

 In view of the proven misconduct, the penalty imposed does not shock our sense of fairness (Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 39-40, 724 N.Y.S.2d 680, 747 N.E.2d 1280 [2001] ).