Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
FIRST BANK OF THE AMERICAS, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Dennis C. COLLINS, Doing Business as Dennis C. Collins, P.C., Respondent-Appellant.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), entered December 15, 1997, which granted the petition and canceled respondent attorney's purported lien on motor vehicle titles in his possession and directed respondent to turn over said titles to petitioner, unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
The court properly found that petitioner, a secured creditor, had, on the default of Sovereign Leasing Ltd., the right to take possession of the collateral (Zeiss Inc. v. Micro Med. Instruments, Inc., 186 A.D.2d 778, 589 N.Y.S.2d 78), including the subject motor vehicle titles. This right was also provided for in the promissory notes executed by Sovereign. Moreover, as the result of the lessor Sovereign's assignment to petitioner of its interest in the leases as to each of the affected vehicles, Sovereign no longer had any rights in the vehicles. An assignee in good faith for value is entitled to priority over the assignor's creditor whose lien has not been perfected by attachment or otherwise before the assignment. (Norstar Bank v. Lawrence Davis, 238 A.D.2d 892, 661 N.Y.S.2d 106). In any event, respondent, Sovereign's attorney, has neither a valid charging or retaining lien upon the disputed titles and, as such, has no right to sell them. He was, at most, a bailee of the titles. Thus, as the court properly found, based on the underlying facts, respondent cannot claim an attorney's lien.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 09, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)