Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Matthew SICILIANO, Petitioner, For a Judgment, etc., v. Howard SAFIR, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated June 2, 1997, dismissing petitioner from his position as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Diane Lebedeff, J.], entered December 12, 1997), dismissed, without costs.
The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness even accepting at face value, as the hearing officer did, petitioner's claims that his refusal to enter the departmental counseling program, in disobedience of at least four direct orders to do so within six months, was based upon his good faith reliance on his private psychiatrist's advice that such would be harmful to his mental health, and that respondent never explicitly warned him that he faced termination if he continued to disobey such orders. As the hearing officer stated, petitioner's proof concerning his precarious mental condition tends to support rather than undermine his unfitness to serve, and each infraction resulted in a suspension that should have made it clear to petitioner that continued disobedience would not be tolerated indefinitely. The charges sustained here are serious, involving respondent's requirements for order, authority and discipline (see, Matter of Darling v. Hastings, 64 A.D.2d 857, 407 N.Y.S.2d 351), and the determination to dismiss is entitled to “great leeway” (see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 445, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 18, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)