Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of the Arbitration Between ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
Respondent appeals from an order that granted reargument of the petition and, upon reargument, granted in part the petition and permanently stayed 27 of the 30 loss-transfer arbitrations at issue. We affirm.
After the collision of a bus and a passenger vehicle, the injured bus passengers filed no-fault claims with the insurers of both vehicles. Respondent submitted to arbitration 30 loss-transfer claims against petitioner, which then sought to stay arbitration contending, inter alia, that the claims accrued on the date of the underlying accident and were barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 214[5] ).
Supreme Court properly treated petitioner's motion as one to reargue because the Statute of Limitations was raised in the petition (see, Fedchak v. Stay Co., 222 A.D.2d 1125, 636 N.Y.S.2d 709; cf., Mid-State El. Co. v. Empire-Salina Assocs. [Appeal No. 2], 190 A.D.2d 1061, 594 N.Y.S.2d 667; see also, CPLR 7502[b] ) and properly granted in part the petition, permanently staying the 27 arbitrations. It is well-settled that loss-transfer arbitration claims between private insurers accrue on the date of the underlying injury (see, State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Regional Tr. Serv., 79 A.D.2d 858, 859, 434 N.Y.S.2d 486; Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Lumbermen's Cas. Ins. Co., 77 A.D.2d 5, 7, 432 N.Y.S.2d 269, lv. denied 53 N.Y.2d 602, 439 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 421 N.E.2d 853; cf., Matter of Motor Vehicle Acc. Indem. Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 N.Y.2d 214, 652 N.Y.S.2d 584, 674 N.E.2d 1349 [involving an agency of statutory creation] ).
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 19, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)