Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of John L. TAGGART, Petitioner, For a Judgment, etc., v. Howard SAFIR, as Police Commissioner of City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated August 4, 1997, terminating petitioner's employment as Police Sergeant with the New York City Police Department, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Leland DeGrasse, J.], entered March 13, 1998) dismissed, without costs.
Upon review of the record as a whole, we conclude that there is substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 179-180, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183) to support the Commissioner's determination that petitioner, in violation of departmental rules and regulations, failed to investigate an allegation that a police officer was committing acts of aggravated harassment; failed to notify his commanding officer and/or the Internal Affairs Bureau of an allegation of serious misconduct involving a member of the service; and made false and misleading statements during an official department investigation. Having concluded that the Commissioner's determination is supported by substantial evidence, the judicial function has been exhausted; the court “may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice[s] made by the [agency] where the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists” (Matter of Stork Rest. v. Boland, 282 N.Y. 256, 267, 26 N.E.2d 247; accord, State Div. of Human Rights v. Columbia Univ., 39 N.Y.2d 612, 616, 385 N.Y.S.2d 19, 350 N.E.2d 396).
Given the nature of the proven misconduct and the fact that petitioner was previously disciplined for a similar violation, the penalty of dismissal is not so disproportionate as to shock our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Bd. of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 08, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)