Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Kenneth CONNAUGHTON, Petitioner-Respondent, v. The NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Respondent-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered October 3, 2001, which granted petitioner's motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim for injuries sustained in a fall on steps leading into a subway station, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner's submissions sufficiently show that the delay in serving a notice of claim was due to disabling physical and mental conditions caused by the accident, and that respondent's token clerk was told about the accident shortly after it happened by petitioner's companion (see Matter of Strauss v. New York City Tr. Auth., 195 A.D.2d 322, 600 N.Y.S.2d 32). In addition, the accumulation of water and ice on the stairs was either a transient condition that respondent likely could not have investigated even if it had been served with a timely notice (see id.), or, if caused by a clogged drain that respondent had a duty to maintain, as petitioner alleges, should have generated inspection and maintenance records that respondent can retrieve. Respondent's evidence that it was not responsible for maintaining the steps on which petitioner fell or appurtenant drain pipe does not dispel the possibility that the water and ice on the steps was caused by a back-up in the pipes lower down, or otherwise demonstrate that petitioner's claim is “patently meritless” (see Caldwell v. 302 Convent Ave. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., 272 A.D.2d 112, 113-114, 707 N.Y.S.2d 423).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 09, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)