Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jim WHITT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered May 27, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of conspiracy in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (three counts), and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 33 1/313 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Following an ex parte proceeding, the court properly imposed a “lockdown” order, restricting defendant from communicating with anyone but counsel. Upon our review of the entire record including the sealed transcript of the ex parte proceeding, we conclude that the imposition of the order was necessary to ensure the safety of witnesses and the orderly administration of justice, and that the extraordinary security concerns justified an ex parte proceeding (see Alvarez v. Snyder, 264 A.D.2d 27, 702 N.Y.S.2d 5, lv. denied, 95 N.Y.2d 759, 714 N.Y.S.2d 709, 737 N.E.2d 951, cert. denied 531 U.S. 1158, 121 S.Ct. 1110, 148 L.Ed.2d 980). Accordingly, we find no constitutional violation. In any event, even if we were to find the lockdown order to be procedurally improper, we would find no basis for reversal, because the order, in and of itself, only affected the conditions of defendant's confinement (see People ex rel. Chakwin v. Warden, 63 N.Y.2d 120, 125, 480 N.Y.S.2d 719, 470 N.E.2d 146).
Defendant contends that the court improperly relied on the ex parte proceedings leading to the lockdown order when it ruled on the People's application to close the courtroom during the undercover officer's testimony. However, there was no violation of defendant's right of confrontation or right to due process, since the ex parte record was only used to supplement the testimony given by the undercover officer at the Hinton hearing under full cross-examination by defendant (see People v. Frost, 289 A.D.2d 23, 734 N.Y.S.2d 18, lv. granted, 97 N.Y.2d 729, 740 N.Y.S.2d 701, 767 N.E.2d 158). The officer's testimony, independent of the ex parte record, provided an overwhelming basis for the court's closure order (see Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39, 48, 104 S.Ct. 2210, 81 L.Ed.2d 31).
Defendant's right to be present at a material stage of his trial was not violated by his absence from the colloquy where certain codefendants, whom defendant had expressed an interest in calling as witnesses, asserted their Fifth Amendment privileges (see People v. Morales, 80 N.Y.2d 450, 591 N.Y.S.2d 825, 606 N.E.2d 953). This legal proceeding did not involve testimony or concern issues about which defendant had special knowledge.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
By failing to object, by making general or vague objections, or by making objections on different grounds from those raised on appeal, defendant has failed to preserve any of his remaining claims and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Furthermore, the alleged errors, if any, did not affect the verdict or sentence.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 10, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)