Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Damon ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered December 1, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree (three counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees and perjury in the first degree (four counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the prosecutor to call a witness who had indicated that she would assert a meritless Fifth Amendment privilege and unjustifiably refuse to testify, and the prosecutor's good faith, persistent but unsuccessful attempts to obtain answers did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. It was reasonable for the prosecutor to believe that the witness might abandon her refusal to testify if called to the stand and admonished by the court, and her refusal to testify did not add critical weight to the People's case or otherwise provide them with any unfair advantage (see People v. Berg, 59 N.Y.2d 294, 464 N.Y.S.2d 703, 451 N.E.2d 450 [1983] ).
Defendant's challenges to the People's summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged remarks constituted fair comment on the evidence made in response to defense arguments, and that they did not shift the burden of proof (see People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, 666 N.Y.S.2d 572 [1997], lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 976, 672 N.Y.S.2d 855, 695 N.E.2d 724 [1998] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 08, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)