Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: NASIR J., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Naomi J., Respondent-Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara P. Schechter, J.), entered on or about June 23, 2003, which, following a prior determination that the subject child had been abused, placed him in petitioner's custody for a period of one year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner satisfied its burden of making an initial prima facie showing of abuse by introducing medical testimony establishing that the child had sustained a fractured left femur that was “of such a nature as would ordinarily not be sustained or exist except by reason of the acts or omissions of the parent or other person responsible for the care of such child” (Family Court Act § 1046[a][ii] ), and that the mother's explanations for this injury were implausible or otherwise unreasonable. Indeed, the mother failed to rebut the presumption of culpability with a credible and reasonable explanation of how the boy had suffered a broken leg (see Matter of Benjamin L., 9 A.D.3d 153, 155, 780 N.Y.S.2d 8 [2004] ), or otherwise to demonstrate why she was not guilty of abuse. Moreover, it is well settled that credibility determinations by the Family Court must be accorded due deference since it is in the best position to assess the witnesses (see Matter of Irene O., 38 N.Y.2d 776, 777, 381 N.Y.S.2d 865, 345 N.E.2d 337 [1975] ). Inasmuch as the record contains ample evidence to justify the fact-finding of abuse, there is no basis for disturbing its order of disposition.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 21, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)