Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ALEXIS MARIE P., a Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Michael P., Respondent-Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about December 1, 2005, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent father sexually abused the subject child, released the child to non-respondent mother with supervision by petitioner Administration for Children's Services (ACS) for a period of 12 months and directed the mother to enforce the order of protection issued against respondent prohibiting him from having contact with the child until she reaches the age of 18, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent's challenges to the qualifications of ACS's expert in child sexual abuse are unpreserved (see Matter of Kaitlyn R., 267 A.D.2d 894, 896, 700 N.Y.S.2d 533 [1999] ), and we decline to review them. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion in qualifying the expert and permitting the testimony regarding the behavior of child sexual abuse victims (see Matter of Evan Y., 307 A.D.2d 399, 399-400, 761 N.Y.S.2d 720 [2003] ). The admission of hospital records containing the child's recollections of past abuse was also properly permitted under Family Court Act § 1046(a)(vi) (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 117-118, 524 N.Y.S.2d 19, 518 N.E.2d 914 [1987]; Matter of Sabrina M., 6 A.D.3d 759, 760, 775 N.Y.S.2d 96 [2004] ).
The finding that respondent sexually abused his daughter was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (Family Court Act § 1012[e][iii]; § 1046 [b] [i] ). The child's in-court testimony and out-of-court statements were corroborated by the medical records and the testimony of the child sexual abuse expert, who, after evaluating the child, concluded that she had been abused (Matter of Jaclyn P., 86 N.Y.2d 875, 635 N.Y.S.2d 169, 658 N.E.2d 1042 [1995], cert. denied 516 U.S. 1093, 116 S.Ct. 816, 133 L.Ed.2d 760 [1996] ). Once ACS established its prima facie case, respondent presented no credible evidence in his defense (see Matter of Philip M., 82 N.Y.2d 238, 244, 604 N.Y.S.2d 40, 624 N.E.2d 168 [1993] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 27, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)