Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David BROWN, true name Daniel Haynesworth, also known as Kenneth Purter, also known as David Rayford, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), rendered October 17, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of violation of probation, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 12 1/212 to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's written waiver of his right to appeal his violation of probation conviction encompassed his excessive sentence claim (see People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327 [1998] ). In any event, were we to find otherwise, we would perceive no basis for reducing the sentence, given the seriousness of defendant's criminal record. The resentencing court properly took into consideration the fact that defendant had fraudulently obtained a sentence of probation by concealing his identity and criminal history, as he had done many times before.
Defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based on factual assertions outside the record and is thus unreviewable on direct appeal. To the extent the present record permits review, it establishes that defendant received effective assistance under both the state and federal standards (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 [1998]; People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 404, 633 N.Y.S.2d 270, 657 N.E.2d 265 [1995]; see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 [1984] ).
Defendant's remaining contentions, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief, are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 06, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)