Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel JACK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee Allyn White, J.), rendered April 22, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. At a location known for narcotics activity, a trained and experienced officer observed defendant transfer an unidentified object or objects to another man through a maneuver in which the two men placed their cupped hands together. The officer also noticed that the second man was about to hand something to defendant. As the officer approached and identified himself, defendant walked away and the second man dropped the objects that had been in his hand. The officer also observed that the second man had a $20 bill in the hand he had been extending to defendant. These circumstances provided probable cause for defendant's arrest (see People v. Jones, 90 N.Y.2d 835, 660 N.Y.S.2d 549, 683 N.E.2d 14 [1997]; People v. Graham, 211 A.D.2d 55, 626 N.Y.S.2d 95 [1995], lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 795, 632 N.Y.S.2d 508, 656 N.E.2d 607 [1995] ), and it was not necessary for the People to establish that, prior to defendant's arrest, the officer recognized the objects dropped by the apparent buyer to be packets of drugs.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 06, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)