Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marco VARELA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Patrick J. LYNCH, both individually and in his capacity as President of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered September 1, 2004, awarding plaintiff $39,596, plus interest, costs and disbursements, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered July 9, 2004, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's cross motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the aforesaid order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
Damages were assessed pursuant to a prior order, affirmed by this Court, finding that defendant Lynch, the President of defendant Patrolmen's Benevolent Association (PBA), wrongfully expelled plaintiff from his position as a PBA trustee, and directing plaintiff's reinstatement “with an award of back pay and other economic damages” (304 A.D.2d 398, 758 N.Y.S.2d 42 [2003], lv. dismissed 1 N.Y.3d 566, 775 N.Y.S.2d 783, 807 N.E.2d 896 [2003] ). The amount awarded represents the sum of the so-called “constitutionals” that plaintiff was not paid during the period of his wrongful expulsion. Ample evidence supports the finding that the constitutionals that the PBA pays its trustees are in the nature of salary (see Black's Law Dictionary 1364 [8th ed. 2004] ), paid annually in monthly installments to all trustees in equal amounts fixed at 50% of the base salary of a first-grade patrolman, and, unlike a much smaller bi-weekly payment that plaintiff was not awarded, not in any manner dependent upon documentary proof of actual expenses incurred. Given this evidence, and the prior order, it does not avail the PBA that its Constitution provides that constitutionals are for expenses incurred in maintaining office.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 06, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)