Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of SABOOR C., Jamar C., and Aishah C.
John C. (respondent) appeals from an order that, inter alia, revoked a suspended judgment entered upon a finding of permanent neglect and terminated his parental rights with respect to his child Aishah C. Although the parties stipulated that respondent had complied with the terms of the suspended judgment, such compliance does not necessarily lead to dismissal of the petition seeking to revoke the suspended judgment (see Matter of Michael B., 80 N.Y.2d 299, 311, 590 N.Y.S.2d 60, 604 N.E.2d 122). A hearing on a petition alleging the violation of a suspended judgment is part of the dispositional phase of a permanent neglect proceeding (see Matter of Robert T., 270 A.D.2d 961, 704 N.Y.S.2d 436, lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 758, 713 N.Y.S.2d 2, 734 N.E.2d 1213), and the “order of disposition shall be made * * * solely on the basis of the best interests of the child” (Family Ct Act § 631). Based upon the facts herein, to which the parties stipulated, we agree with Family Court that the termination of respondent's parental rights was in Aishah's best interests. Aishah had lived with her foster family for the past eight years, she wished to remain with her foster family, and the foster family had indicated a desire to adopt her. Respondent was incarcerated when petitioner commenced this proceeding and would not be eligible for parole for another three years, at which time Aishah would be 16 years old. We therefore conclude that the court properly terminated respondent's parental rights with respect to Aishah.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 21, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)