Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Proceeding, etc., JOSEPH S., et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v. MICHELLE R.F., etc., Respondent-Appellant. Law Guardian for the Child.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about February 14, 2002, which, after a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, awarded custody of the subject child to the petitioning paternal grandparents, under continuing supervision by the Administration for Children's Services, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
After having found that there existed sufficient evidence of exceptional circumstances due to the mother's inadequate guardianship and supervision, the court properly considered the child's best interests in the context of this custody proceeding (Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277). The Family Court's ruling that the best interests of the child dictated award of custody to petitioners, who have provided a loving and stable home for her, and in whose home she is flourishing, was supported by the requisite fair preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Shaka Efion C., 207 A.D.2d 740, 616 N.Y.S.2d 620; Matter of Gerald M., 112 A.D.2d 6, 490 N.Y.S.2d 398).
Respondent, who has been granted biweekly supervised visitation, was found to have left the child unsupervised in a home in which four weapons, at least two of which were loaded, were present; she has also failed to complete a prescribed program of counseling. Contrary to her assertions, there is no evidence in the record that petitioners interfered in the parental relationship (compare Matter of Brittni K., 297 A.D.2d 236, 746 N.Y.S.2d 290).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 27, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)