Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter ATKINS, a/k/a Walter Logan, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J.), rendered June 19, 2002, convicting defendant, on his pleas of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and bail jumping in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to consecutive terms of 3 to 6 years and 1 1/212 to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's motions to dismiss the indictments made on the grounds of excessive delay in sentencing and denial of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. On August 2, 2000, defendant pleaded guilty on the controlled substance indictment. On September 13, 2000, he did not appear for sentencing and a warrant was issued for his arrest. On March 2, 2001, defendant was arrested on a new charge in the Bronx, where he gave a different first name. While the People and the court noted that defendant had an outstanding warrant against him, the court was unable to obtain a copy at that time. Defendant was granted bail and the case was adjourned until March 8, 2001 and then March 13, 2001. Defendant, who had posted bail, failed to appear on either date, although the People were prepared to lodge the warrant had he appeared. On April 15, 2002, defendant was arrested on yet another charge and returned on the original warrant. He was then indicted for bail jumping because he failed to appear for sentencing on September 13, 2000, or within 30 days thereafter.
Since the delay in sentencing, and the accompanying delay in prosecuting defendant for bail jumping were almost entirely because defendant absconded in 2000, and then again in 2001, the People did not violate his right to be sentenced on the drug indictment without unreasonable delay (see People v. Reyes, 214 A.D.2d 233, 632 N.Y.S.2d 123, lv. denied 87 N.Y.2d 850, 638 N.Y.S.2d 609, 661 N.E.2d 1391), nor did the People violate defendant's speedy trial rights on the bail jumping charge (see People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442, 445, 373 N.Y.S.2d 79, 335 N.E.2d 303). Had defendant appeared as required on March 8, 2001 or March 13, 2001, the People were prepared to lodge the warrant against him. He failed to return to court as required and all but the delay between March 2 and March 8, 2001 is attributable to him.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 24, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)