Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Leroy WRAY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 654 MADISON AVENUE ASSOCIATES, L.P., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
654 MADISON AVENUE ASSOCIATES, L.P., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. P.S. MARCATO ELEVATOR CO., INC., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.), entered July 11, 1997, which, in an action by plaintiff elevator maintenance worker against defendants building owners for common-law negligence and violations of Labor Law §§ 241(6) and 200, and a third-party action by the building owners against plaintiff's employer, denied the owners' and the employer's motions for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss so much of the second cause of action as is based upon a violation of Labor Law § 241(6), and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
We reject appellants' claims that the owners bore no common-law responsibility for plaintiff's injuries caused by the dangerous condition he was called upon to repair, since the accident was caused not by the noise and vibration in the compensating elevator sheave that plaintiff was called upon to remedy, but by the absence of a pit stop shut-off switch (see, 9 NYCRR § 1062.3 [d]; compare, Kowalsky v. Conreco Co., 264 N.Y. 125, 190 N.E. 206). We agree with the IAS court that an issue of fact exists as to whether this particular building was required to have such a switch. However, it was error not to dismiss so much of the action as claims a violation of Labor Law § 241(6), since plaintiff was not engaged in construction, excavation or demolition work at the time of the accident (see, Spiteri v. Chatwal Hotels, 247 A.D.2d 297, 299, 669 N.Y.S.2d 282, 285). We have considered appellants' other arguments and find them to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 20, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)