Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rodney SNYDER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ira R. Globerman, J.), rendered March 15, 2002, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (two counts), endangering the welfare of a child and criminal contempt in the first degree (two counts), and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 18 years for the attempted murder conviction, 7 years for the assault conviction, and 1 year each for the criminal possession of a weapon and endangering the welfare of a child convictions, to run consecutively to consecutive terms of 1 1/313 to 4 years for the contempt convictions, unanimously affirmed.
The court was not obligated, sua sponte, to order a CPL article 730 examination (see Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375, 86 S.Ct. 836, 15 L.Ed.2d 815 [1966]; People v. Tortorici, 92 N.Y.2d 757, 686 N.Y.S.2d 346, 709 N.E.2d 87 [1999], cert. denied 528 U.S. 834, 120 S.Ct. 94, 145 L.Ed.2d 80 [1999]; People v. Morgan, 87 N.Y.2d 878, 638 N.Y.S.2d 942, 662 N.E.2d 260 [1995] ). The court was familiar with defendant after observing him during numerous court appearances, and despite the fact that he made questionable decisions and disregarded the sound advice of counsel, there was no indication that defendant was unable to understand the proceedings and assist in his defense. Likewise, there is no evidence to cast doubt on the validity of defendant's waiver of his right to a jury trial.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining contentions, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 02, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)