Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Royden McPHERSON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY PARTNERSHIP HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Phillip Walcott, Defendant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered July 6, 2006, which, in an action for personal injuries under the Labor Law, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of New York City Partnership Housing Development Fund Company dismissing the complaint as against it.
Defendant is a not-for-profit corporation that takes title to properties from the City of New York and converts them into affordable housing. Plaintiff, an employee of defendant's general contractor, was injured on one such property while taking down construction-phase perimeter fencing in anticipation of a closing. However, the deed transferring the property from defendant to the nonparty purchaser had already been duly executed by defendant several weeks before the accident and by the purchaser at a closing conducted the day before the accident. Thus, the conveyance of the property presumptively took effect before the accident (Real Property law § 244; see Whalen v. Harvey, 235 A.D.2d 792, 793, 653 N.Y.S.2d 159 [1997], lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 816, 659 N.Y.S.2d 857, 681 N.E.2d 1304 [1997] ), and, unless the presumption is rebutted, defendant cannot be held liable as the owner of the property. The mere fact that, presumably pursuant to plaintiff's employer's contract with defendant and at defendant's behest, plaintiff was performing construction-related work on the property after the date on the deed is insufficient to rebut the presumption that the property was conveyed prior to the accident. We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 14, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)