Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Leequisha JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. Joseph M. PASQUALE, et al., Defendants.
Joseph M. Pasquale, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Sheehan Memorial Hospital, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries that she sustained when she was struck by a vehicle driven by defendant Joseph Washington. Washington's vehicle had collided with a vehicle driven by defendant Joseph M. Pasquale. Plaintiff had been walking in the street because the sidewalk was snow-covered. Pasquale commenced a third-party action against third-party defendant, Sheehan Memorial Hospital (Hospital), the owner of the property abutting the sidewalk. The third-party action sought indemnification and/or contribution from the Hospital, alleging that the injury to plaintiff resulted from the Hospital's culpable conduct. Supreme Court erred in denying the Hospital's motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. “ ‘As a general rule it is only the municipality which may be held liable for the negligent failure to remove snow and ice from a public sidewalk * * *, unless a charter, statute or an ordinance clearly imposes liability upon the owner in favor the injured pedestrian’ ” (Roark v. Hunting, 24 N.Y.2d 470, 475, 301 N.Y.S.2d 59, 248 N.E.2d 896). Although Buffalo City Code § 413-50(A) requires “every owner or occupant of any premises abutting any public street to remove, before 9:00 A.M., all snow and ice which may have fallen upon the sidewalk abutting said premises”, that section does not impose liability on the owner in favor of an injured pedestrian (see, Sacco v. City of Buffalo, 78 A.D.2d 1000, 433 N.Y.S.2d 915). Although the Hospital may be liable if it created the dangerous condition by its snow removal efforts (see, Jimenez v. Cummings, 226 A.D.2d 112, 640 N.Y.S.2d 61; Stewart v. Haleviym, 186 A.D.2d 731, 731-732, 589 N.Y.S.2d 792), here, the Hospital met its burden of establishing that it did not create a dangerous condition, and Pasquale failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and third-party complaint dismissed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 21, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)