Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John A. CIANCIO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WOODLAWN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
WOODLAWN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v. WESTCHESTER VAULT COMPANY, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered on or about February 13, 1997, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant and third-party plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff is employed as a burial vault installer by third-party defendant Westchester Vault Company. In the course of lowering the lid onto a burial vault that he had installed at Woodlawn Cemetery, plaintiff fell from the six-inch-wide plank on which he was standing after one of the hundreds of mourners in attendance at the funeral came into contact with him. Plaintiff fell into the open grave, sustaining unspecified injuries. The complaint seeks to impose liability upon defendant Woodlawn, as owner of the cemetery, under Labor Law §§ 200, 240(1) and 241(6). Liability against the funeral home is predicated on its failure to undertake measures to control the large number of mourners.
Woodlawn Cemetery brought a third-party action against plaintiff's employer, Westchester Vault Company, seeking indemnification. Supreme Court denied the respective defense motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and third-party complaint, finding that triable issues of fact exist with regard to both the allegations of statutory violations of the Labor Law and of common-law negligence for failing to undertake crowd control measures. Woodlawn and Westchester Vault Company both appeal.
Labor Law § 200 is a codification of the common-law duty to maintain a safe work site imposed on the party having “the authority to control the activity bringing about the injury” (Russin v. Picciano & Son, 54 N.Y.2d 311, 317, 445 N.Y.S.2d 127, 429 N.E.2d 805). The defense that plaintiff's injuries were sustained as the result of an intervening agent is unpersuasive because the danger presented by a large crowd is a matter of common experience, and foreseeable intervening misconduct will not serve to supersede liability (Gordon v. Eastern Ry. Supply, 82 N.Y.2d 555, 562, 606 N.Y.S.2d 127, 626 N.E.2d 912; Rosario v. City of New York, 157 A.D.2d 467, 470, 549 N.Y.S.2d 661). There is no question that Woodlawn Cemetery, as owner of the property and the party allegedly supplying the plank from which plaintiff fell, is exposed to liability for its failure to maintain the site so as to provide a safe workplace.
The complaint also states a viable cause of action under Labor Law § 240(1), which imposes a nondelegable duty upon property owners and general contractors to furnish suitable devices to ensure the safety of workers exposed to elevation-related risks while engaged in the performance of work upon a “structure”. The term is construed liberally to include “ ‘any production or piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner’ (Caddy v. Interborough R.T. Co., 195 N.Y. 415, 420, 88 N.E. 747)” (Lewis-Moors v. Contel, 78 N.Y.2d 942, 573 N.Y.S.2d 636, 578 N.E.2d 434 [telephone pole constitutes a structure]; Dedario v. New York Tel. Co., 162 A.D.2d 1001, 557 N.Y.S.2d 794 [telephone pole]; Smith v. Shell Oil Co., 85 N.Y.2d 1000, 630 N.Y.S.2d 962, 654 N.E.2d 1210 [Shell sign]; Tauriello v. New York Tel. Co., 199 A.D.2d 377, 605 N.Y.S.2d 373 [utility pole] ). A grave vault is encompassed within the liberal definition accorded to the term “structure” (see, Covey v. Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., 218 A.D.2d 197, 637 N.Y.S.2d 992 [buried gas pipeline is a structure], affd. 89 N.Y.2d 952, 655 N.Y.S.2d 854, 678 N.E.2d 466), and the plank placed across the grave opening comes within the general scope of “scaffolding” (see, Pioli v. Morgan Guar. Trust Co., 199 A.D.2d 144, 145, 605 N.Y.S.2d 254, lv. denied 87 N.Y.2d 801, 637 N.Y.S.2d 688, 661 N.E.2d 160). Finally, the excavation provides the necessary height differential to constitute an elevation risk against which the statute affords protection (Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509, 514, 577 N.Y.S.2d 219, 583 N.E.2d 932).
Plaintiff also states a viable claim against the cemetery under Labor Law § 241(6), requiring compliance by the property owner with rules and regulations promulgated by the Commissioner of Labor (see, Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 N.Y.2d 494, 601 N.Y.S.2d 49, 618 N.E.2d 82). A grave is an “excavation” within the purview of the statute, requiring adequate safety measures to be implemented (see, Mosher v. State of New York, 80 N.Y.2d 286, 288, 590 N.Y.S.2d 53, 604 N.E.2d 115 [“the scope of subdivision (6) is not limited to building sites”] ).
As to the third-party complaint, it is settled that a party subjected to absolute vicarious liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1) may seek contribution from a party whose culpable conduct caused the injury (Kelly v. Diesel Constr., 35 N.Y.2d 1, 6, 358 N.Y.S.2d 685, 315 N.E.2d 751; Guillory v. Nautilus Real Estate, 208 A.D.2d 336, 339, 624 N.Y.S.2d 110, lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 881, 635 N.Y.S.2d 943, 659 N.E.2d 766; Brezinski v. Olympia & York Water St. Co., 218 A.D.2d 633, 631 N.Y.S.2d 23).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 14, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)