Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sylvia MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered July 6, 2000, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the second degree, grand larceny in the second degree, and perjury in the first degree, and sentencing her to concurrent terms of 5 to 15 years, 5 to 15 years and 2 1/313 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's motion to dismiss based on preindictment delay was properly denied (see People v. Singer, 44 N.Y.2d 241, 405 N.Y.S.2d 17, 376 N.E.2d 179; see also United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783, 795-796, 97 S.Ct. 2044, 52 L.Ed.2d 752). The People established good cause for the delay by detailing their extensive investigation into the intricate circumstantial evidence against defendant, including complex scientific and medical evidence. Given the nature of the evidence, the People were required to exercise great caution in deciding whether or not to commence a prosecution. It was reasonable under these circumstances for the People to spend lengthy periods of time pursuing aspects of the investigation that appeared to be promising but were ultimately fruitless. There was no indication that any of the delay was intended to gain tactical advantage or was otherwise motivated by bad faith. Therefore, the balancing of the reasons for the delay with all other relevant factors, including the lack of a showing of specific prejudice to defendant, establishes that defendant was not entitled to dismissal (see People v. Rodriguez, 281 A.D.2d 375, 723 N.Y.S.2d 159, lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 901, 730 N.Y.S.2d 798, 756 N.E.2d 86).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 23, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)