Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: GUARDIANSHIP, etc., ETAJAWA A., etc., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Roniqua A., Respondent-Appellant, The Children's Aid Society, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on or about November 28, 2001, which upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights with respect to the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of permanent neglect based on respondent mother's failure to plan for the subject child's future should be affirmed since the evidence clearly and convincingly demonstrated that despite the agency's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parent-child relationship by arranging and facilitating visitation, parenting skills classes and family therapy, respondent attended less than half of the scheduled visits, attended only four therapy sessions and never attended a parenting skills class and thus failed effectively to address the parenting deficiencies that had led to the child's placement. “[A]n agency that has embarked on a diligent course but faces an utterly uncooperative or indifferent parent should nevertheless be deemed to have fulfilled its duty” (Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 385, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139; see also Matter of Joshua J., 196 A.D.2d 719, 601 N.Y.S.2d 913).
The dispositional hearing was properly conducted in respondent's absence after she refused the court's request that she remain in the courtroom and contribute to the hearing, and inasmuch as there was no indication that respondent had progressed or would progress toward acquisition of the parenting skills necessary to address the child's significant special needs, Family Court properly concluded that it was in the child's best interests to terminate respondent's parental rights and free the child for adoption.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 24, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)