Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application for Custody, etc., BABY BOY, B., etc., et al., Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Tajuana B., etc., Respondent–Appellant, The Salvation Army Services for Children, Petitioner–Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara Schechter, J.), entered on or about January 12, 1998, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject children and committing their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, upon fact-finding determinations of abandonment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We see no reason to disturb Family Court's finding of credibility rejecting respondent's testimony that she or her prison social worker called the agency on five occasions during the abandonment period in an effort to communicate with the children, but either was told by the receptionist to call back or got no answer. In any event, such testimony, even if credited, does not show contact substantial enough to avoid a finding of abandonment, particularly in the absence of evidence of any kind of contact with the agency for more than a year prior to the commencement of the abandonment period, going back to when the older child was 10 months old and the younger child was not yet born (see, Matter of Dawntal Danielle C., 170 A.D.2d 375, 566 N.Y.S.2d 269; Matter of Anthony M., 195 A.D.2d 315, 316, 600 N.Y.S.2d 37; Matter of Oneka O., 249 A.D.2d 233, 672 N.Y.S.2d 316). We agree with Family Court, and the agency and the children's Law Guardian, that termination of parental rights is in the children's best interests.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)