Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Asmin ABREU, a/k/a Asain Abreu, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered January 22, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and two counts of criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 15 years to life, 1 year, and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Evidence of defendant's conduct in answering a police officer's knock on the closed apartment door, and then aggressively shoving his way out of the apartment, combined with the fact that substantial amounts of drugs and drug packaging items were in open view virtually throughout the relatively small apartment premises, provided a sufficient evidentiary basis for the jury's determination that defendant, the sole occupant of an apartment obviously used as a drug factory, constructively possessed the contraband in question (see, People v. Bundy, 90 N.Y.2d 918, 663 N.Y.S.2d 837, 686 N.E.2d 496). Any credibility issues raised by the testimony of the People's witnesses were properly placed before the jury and its determinations are supported by the record.
The court's spontaneous response to an oral question posed by a juror does not warrant reversal in these circumstances.
Defendant's challenges to the court's main charge are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 25, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)