Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael TROMBETTA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 775 PARK AVENUE, INC., Defendant, Albert B. Ashforth, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. [And A Third-Party Action].
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Targum, J.), entered July 15, 1996, and order, same court (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered September 8, 1998, which, in an action by plaintiff building maintenance worker for personal injuries sustained while pushing a trash cart up an allegedly excessively steep ramp, denied defendant-appellant former managing agent's motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Appellant is not entitled to summary judgment merely because it was no longer the managing agent of the residential cooperative in which plaintiff is employed at the time plaintiff was injured. Appellant was managing the premises at the time the allegedly defective ramp was built, and, as such, can be held liable for affirmative acts of negligence in its design and construction (see, Jones v. Park Realty, 168 A.D.2d 945, 565 N.Y.S.2d 637, affd. 79 N.Y.2d 795, 579 N.Y.S.2d 650, 587 N.E.2d 288; cf., Keo v. Kimball Brooklands Corp., 189 A.D.2d 679, 592 N.Y.S.2d 373). We agree with the motion court that issues of fact exist as to appellant's role in and control over the design and construction of the ramp. Nor is appellant entitled to summary judgment by reason of the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law where it admittedly had no connection with the building whatsoever at the time plaintiff was injured (see, 109 N.Y. Jur.2d, Workers' Compensation, § 81, at 258).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)