Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lars LONNINGE, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Michael BERZAK, et al., Defendants–Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered September 3, 1998, which, in an action for a partnership accounting of defendants' management of a leasehold and for imposition of a constructive trust thereon, granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants from commencing an eviction proceeding against plaintiff or interfering with his use and occupancy of the subject premises, and denied defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff makes a strong showing that his relationship with defendants with respect to the original lease was not that of subtenant but rather member in a partnership formed to hold and manage the leasehold, and that prior to the lease's expiration and contrary to the parties' express understanding that defendants were to negotiate a renewal lease with the landlord on the partnership's behalf and in the parties' joint names, defendants entered into a renewal lease that named only the individual defendant's corporation as the new tenant. Such showing makes imposition of a constructive trust and an accounting appropriate remedies should plaintiff ultimately establish his interest in a partnership opportunity in the renewal lease (see, Schneidman v. Tollman, 190 A.D.2d 524, 593 N.Y.S.2d 23; Palazzo v. Palazzo, 121 A.D.2d 261, 265, 503 N.Y.S.2d 381). Injunctive relief against a threatened eviction that would tend to render the constructive trust ineffectual was properly granted upon appropriate conditions.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 22, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)