Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
William DALY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Respondent,
Cipico Construction Corp., Defendant. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered January 30, 1998, dismissing an action by a laborer to recover for personal injuries pursuant to Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6), upon the parties' respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The ceiling of the underground steam vault in which plaintiff, a utility company employee, was working at ground level, lubricating a slip joint in order to stop a leak in a steam main, was a completed structure, and its collapse and plaintiff's resultant injury was not due to an elevation-related hazard within the meaning of Labor Law § 240(1) (see, Misseritti v. Mark IV Constr. Co., 86 N.Y.2d 487, 634 N.Y.S.2d 35, 657 N.E.2d 1318; Fox v. Jenny Eng'g Corp., 122 A.D.2d 532, 505 N.Y.S.2d 270, affd. on other grounds 70 N.Y.2d 761, 520 N.Y.S.2d 750, 514 N.E.2d 1374; Amato v. State of New York, 241 A.D.2d 400, 660 N.Y.S.2d 576, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 805, 668 N.Y.S.2d 560, 691 N.E.2d 632). In support of his Labor Law § 241(6) claim, plaintiff cites Industrial Code (12 NYCRR § 23-1.7(a)), but he fails to present any evidence that the work he was engaged in was “normally exposed to falling material or objects” (12 NYCRR § 23-1.7[a][1]), and the claim was therefore properly dismissed (see, Amato v. State of New York, id., at 401-402, 660 N.Y.S.2d 576).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 27, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)