Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obus, J.), rendered November 25, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, and judgment, same court (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered January 10, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a concurrent term of 41/212 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly granted the People's request for a missing witness charge with respect to defendant's mother since the evidence demonstrates that her testimony would have been material to defendant's alibi defense in that she was sufficiently knowledgeable on the alibi issue (People v. Garcia, 250 A.D.2d 421, 673 N.Y.S.2d 91). The testimony would not have been cumulative to the testimony of the other alibi witness since “the lines of dispute were drawn sharply in terms of credibility and the testimony of [defendant's mother], the only additional person who was present [with defendant at the apartment when the crime took place], might have made the difference” on this material issue (People v. Rodriguez, 38 N.Y.2d 95, 101, 378 N.Y.S.2d 665, 341 N.E.2d 231; see also, People v. Brockington, 184 A.D.2d 646, 647, 584 N.Y.S.2d 916, lv. denied 80 N.Y.2d 927, 589 N.Y.S.2d 855, 603 N.E.2d 960).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)