Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leon STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Elbert Hinkson, J.), rendered June 6, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 years probation, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. In the course of exercising his right to inquire and questioning defendant and his companions about a report, received moments before, of a heated dispute involving a firearm at a specified building, the officer encountered an escalating situation in which he reasonably perceived his safety was in jeopardy (People v. DeBour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 221, 223, 386 N.Y.S.2d 375, 352 N.E.2d 562). In an early morning encounter in a small enclosed vestibule, the request of four individuals to raise their hands was a reasonable and minimal intrusion where these individuals were observed by the police to be engaged in a dispute, appeared very nervous, claimed that one was a State Trooper (and presumably armed), and did not truthfully and forthrightly answer the officer's questions. The intrusion, which resulted in the officer's observation of a firearm, was extremely minimal and designed simply to insure the officer's safety (see, People v. Oeller, 191 A.D.2d 355, 356, 595 N.Y.S.2d 192, affd. 82 N.Y.2d 774, 604 N.Y.S.2d 537, 624 N.E.2d 674). In any event, we find that the police action was based on reasonable suspicion that one or more of the group was armed and posed a threat to the officers.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)