Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ASHANTE M. and Others, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Timothy M., Respondent-Appellant, Shermaine L., Respondent, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about January 8, 2004, which, after a fact-finding determination that respondent father had neglected his children, inter alia, released six-year-old Ashante and three-year-old Terrel to his custody under the supervision of petitioner Administration for Children's Services for a period of 12 months, and the infant Taquwan to respondent mother's custody under a similar supervisory arrangement, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court's finding was based on a preponderance of the evidence, as supported by the presentment agency and appellant's own testimony, that appellant exposed these children to actual harm, or at least the imminent danger of harm (see Nicholson v. Scoppetta, 3 N.Y.3d 357, 787 N.Y.S.2d 196, 820 N.E.2d 840 [2004] ), by his failure to ensure that respondent mother successfully completed a court-ordered drug treatment program to attain sobriety (Matter of K. Children, 253 A.D.2d 764, 677 N.Y.S.2d 379 [1998] ). Appellant's argument that the agency did not advise him of the mother's failure to complete the program, and that the agency allowed the children to continue residing with their mother, are unavailing in light of the duty the Family Court Act places on a parent to ensure his own children's safety.
We have considered appellant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 21, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)