Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lamar SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.), rendered November 26, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the first degree, two counts of murder in the second degree (intentional murder), and three counts of murder in the second degree (felony murder), and sentencing him, to a term of life imprisonment without parole on the first-degree murder conviction, concurrent with two consecutive terms of 25 years to life on the intentional murder convictions and three consecutive terms of 25 years to life on the felony murder convictions, unanimously affirmed.
The trial record, taken together with the record of the reconstruction hearing, establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to be present at the voir dire sidebar conference in question (see, People v. Spotford, 85 N.Y.2d 593, 599, 627 N.Y.S.2d 295, 650 N.E.2d 1296), in that, at the outset of jury selection, the court advised defendant, on the record, of his right to attend all sidebars, and defendant followed his counsel's advice that his attendance at sidebars while escorted to the bench by court officers would give the jurors an unfavorable impression.
To the extent that the prosecutor's summation improperly included references to matters not in evidence and matters calculated to evoke sympathy, these errors were harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt. The remaining challenged portions of the prosecutor's summation were fair comment on the evidence and proper responses to defendant's summation (see, People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, 666 N.Y.S.2d 572, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 976, 672 N.Y.S.2d 855, 695 N.E.2d 724; People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119, 591 N.Y.S.2d 1001, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 884, 597 N.Y.S.2d 945, 613 N.E.2d 977).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 25, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)