Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Commitment and Custody of NICOLE LINA C., etc., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., St. Christopher-Ottilie Children's Services, et al., Petitioners-Respondents, Mary C., Respondent-Appellant.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about March 26, 1996, which, upon a fact finding that respondent mother had permanently neglected the subject child, terminated her parental rights and granted custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Family Court's finding that respondent mother had permanently neglected the subject child within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b was supported by clear and convincing evidence. In this connection, the evidence showed that although the agency diligently endeavored to strengthen the parent-child relationship with the object of reuniting the family, its efforts in this regard were frustrated by respondent's lack of cooperation (see, Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 381, 385, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139). Although the caseworker arranged parent-child visits and provided respondent with funds for transportation, visits were nonetheless sporadic and without positive interaction between parent and child. The agency also referred respondent for therapy and various parenting skills classes, including classes given in Creole, respondent's native language (notwithstanding respondent's ability to communicate effectively in English) but respondent failed to complete any program.
At the dispositional hearing, the agency proved, by a fair preponderance of the evidence (see, Matter of Gerald M., 112 A.D.2d 6, 490 N.Y.S.2d 398), that it was in the best interests of the child that the mother's parental rights be terminated and that the child be freed for adoption (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147-148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 15, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)