Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Minerva PEREZ, Petitioner, For a Judgment, etc., v. Brian J. WING, etc., et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent Brian Wing (“State respondent”) dated July 9, 1997, which, after a hearing held on June 23, 1997, affirmed the determination of respondent Lilliam Barrios-Paoli (“City respondent”) denying petitioner's March, 1996 application for emergency assistance to avoid an eviction, pursuant to 18 NYCRR 352.7(g)(3), 18 NYCRR Part 372 and Social Services Law 350-j, unanimously annulled, on the law and the facts, without costs, the petition pursuant to CPLR Article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Stephen Crane, J.], entered March 9, 1998), granted, the matter remitted to the State respondent for further proceedings in accordance with this decision, and the stay of eviction currently in effect continued, conditioned upon petitioner's continued payment of current rent as it becomes due.
The circumstances which gave rise to petitioner's application were a result of sudden and unforeseeable events, namely the illness and death of a relative and the temporary guardianship of her children, rather than the demands of everyday life (see, Matter of Gaillard v. Lavine, 51 A.D.2d 181, 380 N.Y.S.2d 7, appeal dismissed 40 N.Y.2d 916, 389 N.Y.S.2d 367, 357 N.E.2d 1022). The City respondent's denial was the subject of three hearings, the last after an evidentiary remand by the IAS court. Given the resulting delay, it was improper to consider petitioner's changed circumstances after the initial denial of her emergency application (see, Matter of Wilson v. Blum, 101 Misc.2d 256, 420 N.Y.S.2d 846).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)