Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joel JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), rendered June 23, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 221/212 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Although it is undisputed that the deceased was killed by nine millimeter bullets fired from a nine millimeter pistol, the court properly received in evidence .380 caliber ammunition recovered from defendant's bedroom one week after the shooting. A ballistics expert testified that .380 caliber ammunition, while not ideally suited for such purpose, could be discharged from a nine millimeter pistol (see, People v. Mirenda, 23 N.Y.2d 439, 453, 297 N.Y.S.2d 532, 245 N.E.2d 194; People v. Del Vermo, 192 N.Y. 470, 478-482, 85 N.E. 690; People v. Matias, 112 A.D.2d 897, 493 N.Y.S.2d 318, affd. 67 N.Y.2d 1032, 503 N.Y.S.2d 323, 494 N.E.2d 454). This evidence was admissible as tending to prove defendant's possession of a nine millimeter pistol around the time of the incident, and, therefore, his identity as the perpetrator, and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect. We note that the court gave limiting instructions and the jury was never asked to consider this evidence as demonstrating a propensity to commit crimes. In any event, were we to find that the court erred in admitting the ammunition, we would find such error to be harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt, including the testimony of two eyewitnesses, one of whom was acquainted with defendant.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 09, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)